PIL Token Economics

PIL is a pure utility token designed exclusively for operational use within Pilier blockchain. It is not a tradable asset and maintains a stable target value of €1 per PIL.

Token Overview

Parameter	Value
Ticker	PIL
Target Value	1 PIL ≈ €1
Decimals	6
Genesis Supply	4,000,000 PIL
Type	Non-tradable utility token
Distribution	Strategic allocation (No Public Sale)

Not a Security

PIL is not designed for speculation or investment. It serves as "trust fuel" for blockchain operations and a "vote" in protocol governance. It cannot be traded on external exchanges.

---

Why PIL Exists

The Problem with Traditional Blockchain Tokens

Most blockchain tokens suffer from:

• 💸 Price volatility (unpredictable costs for business budgeting)
• 📈 Speculation (price driven by market hype, not actual utility)
• 🌐 Regulatory complexity (exchange listings trigger MiCA/financial oversight)

The PIL Solution

PIL is designed for industrial reliability:

• ✅ Stable pricing: 1 PIL ≈ €1 (predictable costs via internal target policy)
• ✅ Utility-only: No trading, no speculation, no market manipulation
• ✅ Civic reinvestment: 5% of all transaction fees flow to the Civic Treasury to sustain the public utility layer
• ✅ Sustainable: Dynamic inflation covers validator operational costs until fees scale

---

Supply Model

Genesis Supply

Total supply at launch: 4,000,000 PIL

Inflation Mechanism

PIL uses dynamic inflation to bootstrap validator sustainability during the network growth phase:

Parameter	Value
Initial Inflation	2.5% annually (~75,000 PIL/year)
Maximum Cap	5% annually (governance-adjustable)
Purpose	Covering validator operational costs during low-volume periods
Long-term Target	0% (when transaction fees are sufficient)

How it works:

Operational cost target: up to €500/month/validator (tPIL-governed)
Current fee income: €X/month

If fees < target: → Mint inflation or draw from Validator Bootstrap Pool to cover gap
Else:             → No inflation needed (self-sustainable)

Key insight: As network adoption grows and transaction fees increase, inflation automatically decreases. Eventually, validators become fully self-funded by fees, and inflation can be turned off via governance.

Protocol Fee Distribution

Every transaction fee is split as follows:

• 95% → Validators (split equally among the active set)
• 5% → Civic Treasury (sustains the public utility layer — universities, NGOs, municipalities)

This replaces a burn mechanism with a civic reinvestment loop: commercial activity on the network directly funds public good participation.

Example (3 validators):

Transaction fee: 0.01 PIL
├─ To Civic Treasury: 0.0005 PIL (5%)
├─ To validators: 0.0095 PIL (95%)
└─ Per validator: 0.00317 PIL

---

Token Allocation

PIL tokens are allocated from genesis supply with a focus on ecosystem scalability and European adoption:

Pool	Percentage	Amount (PIL)	Purpose
Commercial Treasury	30%	1,200,000	Funds third-party SaaS partners via a Conditional Scaling model: micro-tranches for pilots, usage-based buyback obligations upon commercialisation.
Civic Treasury	25%	1,000,000	Public utility layer providing free transaction credits to universities, NGOs, and municipalities. Replenished by 5% of network fees and validator excess returns.
Flagship Product Reserve	15%	600,000	Revolving credit line for the anchor SaaS product. Subscription fees are used to buy back consumed PIL, keeping the pool self-replenishing as client volume scales.
Team & Advisory Governance Pool	15%	600,000	Founder and advisor allocation, dedicated to protocol governance (tPIL) and subject to a 48-month linear vesting schedule.
Validator Bootstrap Pool	10%	400,000	Covers validator operational costs up to the current income target per node during the growth phase until fee-based self-sustainability.
Total	100%	4,000,000	—

Allocation Details

Commercial Treasury (30%) — SaaS Onboarding Fund

This allocation funds the growth of the Pilier commercial ecosystem: independent SaaS products that embed Pilier as their EU Sovereign Trust Layer for Digital Product Passport compliance, traceability, or verifiable data integrity.

Target partners are B2B SaaS companies operating in regulated European verticals — such as textile traceability, battery passport compliance, circular economy platforms, or supply chain transparency tools — who need on-chain attestation without building blockchain infrastructure themselves.

---

Onboarding Model: Conditional Scaling

New partners do not receive large upfront grants. Access to PIL is gated by demonstrated commercial traction.

Phase 1 — Pilot (MVP launch):

Partner applies to Foundation
    ↓
Receives micro-tranche: 2,000 – 5,000 PIL
    ↓
Sufficient to launch MVP and validate
product-market fit on Pilier
    ↓
Zero upfront infrastructure cost for the partner

Phase 2 — Commercial Transition:

Partner signs first paying customer(s)
    ↓
Buyback obligation activates (see formula below)
    ↓
Foundation verifies buyback performance
before any limit increase is approved

Phase 3 — Scaling:

Partner requests higher PIL limit
    ↓
Foundation verifies buyback history
    ↓
Limit increased proportionally to proven revenue

---

Buyback Obligation Formula

Each commercial SaaS partner contributes to network infrastructure costs proportionally to their share of total network activity:

Monthly buyback obligation =
  (partner tx count / total network tx count)
  × (validator count × current operational cost target*)

* The validator operational cost target is a governance parameter,
  adjustable via tPIL vote.

Example:

Network total:    4,000,000 tx/month
  ├─ Anchor SaaS:    3,000,000 tx  → 75%
  └─ Partner SaaS:   1,000,000 tx  → 25%

5 validators, operational cost target €500/validator:
  → Network cost: €2,500/month

Anchor SaaS buyback:   75% × €2,500 = 1,875 PIL/month
Partner SaaS buyback:  25% × €2,500 =   625 PIL/month

This formula ensures:

• Partners pay in proportion to what they consume
• Foundation infrastructure costs are covered as the network grows
• No fixed fees — obligations scale naturally with usage

Non-performance: If a partner fails to meet buyback obligations, their PIL allocation is simply not replenished. The Foundation's maximum exposure is limited to the initial micro-tranche (2,000–5,000 PIL).

---

Civic Treasury (25%) — Public Utility Layer

Positioning Pilier as a European public good:

This allocation is dedicated to Public Good Adoption, ensuring that the cost of verifiable compliance never becomes a barrier to transparency. By subsidising on-chain activities for non-commercial actors, Pilier establishes a resilient, civic-driven trust layer that aligns with European sovereign values and environmental oversight.

Free timestamping and DPP creation for:

• 🏛️ Universities: Research data timestamping, thesis proofs
• 🌍 NGOs: Supply chain transparency, sustainability reporting
• 🏢 Municipalities: Public procurement tracking
• 🔬 Research labs: IP protection, experimental data integrity
• 🏭 Industry associations: Free DPP issuance for member organisations (e.g., a textile trade association providing DPPs to all member manufacturers at no cost)

Credit allocation:

University pilot:
├─ 10,000 PIL credit (~10,000 free timestamps)
└─ Renewed monthly up to the approved amount, if consumed

NGO partnership:
├─ 5,000 PIL credit
└─ Focus on textile/electronics traceability

Renewal mechanism:

Credits are renewed monthly by the Foundation up to the approved allocation. Renewal is triggered by consumption — if a partner has not used their current balance, it is not topped up. Unused PIL cannot be reclaimed by the Foundation once transferred, as partners hold their own wallet keys. Approval of new civic partners and allocation amounts is decided by the Foundation, with larger allocations subject to tPIL governance vote.

Replenishment sources:

The Civic Treasury is replenished from two streams:

1. 5% of all network transaction fees — routed directly to the Civic Treasury by protocol, regardless of network activity level
2. Validator excess returns — any PIL earned by validators beyond the operational cost threshold is returned to the Foundation and routed to the Civic Treasury

Network generates fees
    ↓
5% → Civic Treasury (automatic, on-chain)

Validator earns 800 PIL/month, threshold is 500 PIL
    ↓
500 PIL → validator's discretion (exchange or lock as tPIL)
300 PIL excess → returned to Foundation → Civic Treasury

This creates a self-sustaining loop: the more commercial activity on the network, the more the public utility layer is funded.

Purpose: Create legitimacy and "public utility" narrative for regulators and policymakers.

---

Flagship Product Reserve (15%) — Revolving Credit Line

Operational capital dedicated to transaction sponsorship for the anchor SaaS product:

How it works:

Client subscribes ~€299/month (Starter tier)
    ↓
Reserve allocates PIL to sponsor client's on-chain transactions
    ↓
Client consumes PIL for DPP registrations, agent calls, etc.
    ↓
A portion of the subscription fee is used to buy back consumed PIL
    ↓
Pool remains self-replenishing as client count scales

Sustainability:

• Buyback loop: subscription revenue → PIL repurchase → pool refill
• Unused monthly allocations return to the reserve at billing cycle end
• Self-replenishing by design; no external top-up required at steady state

Initial capacity: 600,000 PIL supports the ramp-up period before buyback revenue reaches full coverage.

This pool is currently operated by the Foundation on behalf of the anchor product. The revolving credit model is publicly documented as a reference implementation for third-party SaaS partners adopting the same mechanism.

---

Team & Advisors (15%) — Governance Alignment

Founder tokens exclusively for protocol security and governance:

Key points:

• ✅ Not for sale: Tokens locked in tPIL (vote-escrowed)
• ✅ Governance only: Used to vote on protocol upgrades, fee adjustments
• ✅ Vesting: Linear over 48 months (12-month cliff)
• ✅ Clawback: Tokens reclaimed if founders depart early

tPIL conversion:

Founder locks 100,000 PIL for 48 months
    ↓
Receives 500,000 tPIL (5× multiplier)
    ↓
1 tPIL = 1 vote on governance proposals

Why this matters: Aligns founder incentives with long-term protocol health, not short-term token price.

---

Validator Bootstrap Pool (10%) — Operational Enablement

Covers the gap between transaction fee income and the validator operational cost target during the low-volume phase:

Duration: Until transaction fees are sufficient to cover operational costs without subsidy.

The 400,000 PIL reserve pool acts as a safety buffer.
Combined with 2.5% annual inflation (75,000 PIL/year),
it ensures validator sustainability for 10+ years
even at growing node counts.

├─ Transaction fees increase (adoption grows)
├─ Subsidy decreases (less needed)
└─ Pool lasts 10+ years

Access: Automatically distributed via inflation mechanism (no manual grants).

Infrastructure transition (Year 3+):

During Years 1–2, node infrastructure is covered by the OVH Startup Program grants (€10k in Y1, €100k in Y2), resulting in zero hosting costs for validators and the Foundation.

From Year 3 onward, validators are expected to self-fund their infrastructure from earned PIL. At current OVH EU pricing, a dedicated instance suitable for a Polkadot SDK validator node costs approximately €80–150/month — well within the operational cost target.

Year 3+ validator budget (estimated):
├─ Hosting (OVH dedicated):  ~€100–150/month
├─ DevOps / monitoring:      ~€50–100/month
└─ Available for tPIL lock:  ~€250–350/month

Hosting cost estimates based on OVH EU bare-metal pricing as of 2025. Actual costs depend on validator's infrastructure choices.

---

Validator Economics

Income Sources

Validators earn from two sources:

1. Transaction Fees (Primary)

Every on-chain operation pays a technical gas fee to ensure network security and priority:

Operation	Approximate Cost
Balance transfer	0.001 PIL (€0.001)
Register document	0.0025 PIL (€0.0025)
Create DPP	0.004 PIL (€0.004)
Update DPP state	0.0015 PIL (€0.0015)
Trigger agent	0.005+ PIL (varies)

Fee distribution:

• 95% → Validators (split equally among the active set)
• 5% → Civic Treasury (sustains the public utility layer)

2. Inflation Subsidy (Bootstrap Phase)

During the initial phase with lower transaction volumes, the protocol tops up validator operational cost coverage to meet the current income target (initially €500/month, adjustable via tPIL governance vote).

Example (3 validators, Year 1):

• Monthly fees: €100 total
• Coverage per validator from fees: €33.33/month
• Gap to target: €466.67/month
• Subsidy: The protocol draws from the monthly inflation pool to cover the gap
• Total coverage: €500/month per validator ✓

Example (3 validators, Year 3):

• Monthly fees: €1,500 total
• Coverage per validator from fees: €500/month
• Gap to target: €0
• Subsidy: 0 PIL (inflation automatically phased out)
• Result: Network is fully self-sustainable via fees ✓

---

Reward Management Policy

To ensure Foundation fiat reserves remain balanced, validator PIL rewards are subject to the following policy:

Monthly Operational Cost Coverage:

The Foundation covers validator operational costs up to the current income target per node (initially €500/month, adjustable via tPIL governance vote) at the fixed 1:1 rate. This is not income — it is enablement, analogous to how the EU funds participation in public infrastructure like eIDAS or GAIA-X nodes: the goal is to remove the financial barrier to participation, not to generate profit.

Within the monthly threshold, the validator chooses how to use earned PIL:

Option A: Exchange with Foundation
├─ Sell up to 500 PIL → €500 fiat
└─ Cover hosting, DevOps, admin costs

Option B: Lock for Governance (tPIL)
├─ Convert up to 500 PIL → tPIL
└─ Gain voting power without selling

During Years 1–2, hosting costs are zero (OVH grant-funded). Validators are therefore strongly incentivised to convert rewards to tPIL and build governance influence rather than exchanging for fiat.

Excess Rewards (above monthly threshold):

Any PIL earned beyond the monthly threshold must be returned to the Foundation. The Foundation routes excess tokens as follows:

Monthly validator earnings: 800 PIL
├─ Up to 500 PIL → validator's discretion (exchange or lock as tPIL)
└─ 300 PIL excess → returned to Foundation → Civic Treasury

---

tPIL Conversion for Validators

Validators are highly encouraged to convert their PIL rewards into tPIL (Vote-Escrowed PIL) to gain long-term influence over the protocol.

Governance Multipliers:

Lock Duration	Voting Power Multiplier
1 month	1.0×
6 months	1.5×
12 months	2.0×
24 months	3.5×
48 months	5.0×

Validator Impact: By holding tPIL, validators can vote on:

• 🛠️ Fee Adjustments: Increasing or decreasing base gas costs
• 📈 Inflation Rates: Controlling the bootstrap subsidy speed
• 💰 Operational Cost Target: Adjusting the validator income threshold
• 🛡️ Network Upgrades: Approving new pallets and security patches

Example: A validator earns 1,000 PIL and locks 500 PIL for 48 months. They receive 2,500 tPIL in voting power, gaining significant leverage in shaping the Pilier ecosystem.

---

Transaction Economics

Fee Lifecycle

Technical vs. Commercial Pricing

Important distinction:

Technical gas cost (on-chain):

Register document: 0.0025 PIL
└─ Pure computational and storage cost of the network

Commercial SaaS pricing (pilier.org):

Starter Tier: ~€299/month
├─ Includes: document registrations, agent calls
├─ Covers: Managed infrastructure, support, compliance updates
└─ Gas is a small component of the total service value

Why this matters: Blockchain fees are minimal (€0.0025/document), but full service includes hosting, backups, compliance updates, customer support, etc.

---

Price Stability

Target: 1 PIL ≈ €1

PIL maintains a stable target value through operational design:

How Stability is Achieved

1. No public trading: PIL cannot be bought/sold on exchanges
2. Fixed client pricing: pilier.org always prices subscriptions in euros
3. Internal conversion: Treasury converts € to PIL at 1:1 ratio
4. Predictable costs: Transaction fees set in PIL but denominated in €

Why Stability Matters

For validators:

Operational cost coverage is predictable
→ Can budget for hosting costs
→ No exchange rate risk

For clients:

~€299/month subscription = predictable PIL allocation
→ Transparent costs
→ No surprise bills

For developers:

Gas costs known in advance
→ Can estimate operational expenses
→ No need to monitor token price

Not a Peg

PIL is not algorithmically pegged to EUR. The 1:1 ratio is maintained through:

• Operational policy (pilier.org internal pricing)
• Limited circulation (no external market)
• Governance oversight (can adjust if needed)

---

Governance

Who Controls PIL

The protocol follows a staged decentralization roadmap to ensure both initial stability and long-term community sovereignty.

Phase 1 (Testnet):

• Governance: Sudo key held by Pilier multisig (Founding Team).
• Focus: Technical stability, fast iteration, and protocol stress-testing.

Phase 2 (Mainnet Launch):

• Governance: Sudo key is removed. On-chain voting is enabled for technical partners and validators.
• Model: Basic token-weighted voting (1 PIL = 1 vote).

Phase 3 (Maturity - tPIL): Transition to the PIL Trust (tPIL) system to ensure long-term alignment and prevent short-term governance attacks.

Time-lock mechanics: Users lock their PIL to receive tPIL. Voting power increases non-linearly with the commitment duration:

Lock Duration	Voting Power Multiplier
1 month	1.0× (Base)
12 months	2.0×
24 months	3.5×
48 months	5.0× (Maximum)

Example:

• Alice locks 1,000 PIL for 12 months → Receives 2,000 tPIL.
• Bob locks 1,000 PIL for 48 months → Receives 5,000 tPIL. Bob has 2.5× more influence than Alice, despite having the same amount of tokens, due to his long-term commitment.

Decay Mechanism: tPIL power decays linearly as the lock period expires. To maintain maximum influence, participants must periodically "re-lock" their tokens.

---

Governance Scope

To protect the protocol's integrity, governance is restricted to operational parameters:

✅ What can be adjusted (via tPIL vote):

• Transaction fees: Adjusting gas costs to reflect infrastructure reality
• Inflation rates: Tuning the bootstrap subsidy (within the 5% cap)
• Validator operational cost target: The monthly coverage threshold per node
• Validator Set: Adding or removing institutional nodes
• Treasury Allocation: Deciding on ecosystem grant priorities

❌ What CANNOT be changed:

• Retroactive supply changes: No "burning" of others' tokens or supply resets
• Confiscation: No unilateral taking of client or partner tokens
• Minting beyond cap: The governance cannot override the maximum annual inflation ceiling

---

PIL Trust (tPIL): Reputation Layer

What is tPIL?

PIL Trust (tPIL) represents a participant's long-term commitment and reputation within the Pilier ecosystem.

Unlike PIL (the utility token), tPIL is:

• ❌ Non-transferable (cannot be bought or sold)
• ✅ Earned through commitment (lock PIL for time period)
• ✅ Multi-dimensional utility (governance + marketplace + social proof)
• ✅ Slashable (lost if misbehave)

Core principle: Beyond protocol governance, tPIL serves as a cross-project trust metric, enabling secure interactions and reputation-based security for partners building on Pilier infrastructure.

How to Earn tPIL

Lock PIL tokens for a specified duration:

Lock Duration	Trust Multiplier	Example (1,000 PIL)
1 month	1.0×	1,000 tPIL
6 months	1.5×	1,500 tPIL
12 months	2.0×	2,000 tPIL
24 months	3.5×	3,500 tPIL
48 months	5.0×	5,000 tPIL

Example:

Alice locks 5,000 PIL for 24 months
    ↓
Receives 17,500 tPIL (3.5× multiplier)
    ↓
Can use for governance, marketplace trust bonds, etc.

Trust Decay

tPIL decays linearly as lock period expires:

Lock 1,000 PIL for 12 months → receive 2,000 tPIL
After 6 months: 1,000 tPIL remaining
After 12 months: 0 tPIL (must re-lock)

Why decay? Trust must be continuously demonstrated, not accumulated once.

Use Cases for tPIL

1. Protocol Governance

Vote on proposals with 1 tPIL = 1 vote:

• Transaction fee adjustments
• Validator set changes
• Treasury fund allocations
• Runtime upgrades
• Validator operational cost target

See Governance for details.

2. Marketplace Trust Bonds

For P2P platforms building on Pilier:

Seller reputation system:

High-trust seller (10,000 tPIL):
├─ Can list high-value items
├─ Lower escrow requirements
└─ "Verified Trusted Seller" badge

New seller (100 tPIL):
├─ Limited to small transactions
├─ Higher escrow requirements
└─ Must build reputation

Slashing mechanism:

Seller stakes 500 tPIL on transaction
Buyer disputes quality
    ↓
Decentralized arbitration
    ↓
If seller guilty:
├─ 500 tPIL slashed (burned)
├─ Underlying PIL remains locked
└─ Seller's trust score damaged

If seller innocent:
├─ 500 tPIL returned
└─ Buyer may lose dispute fee

Economic protection: Since tPIL is backed by locked PIL (~€1 each), slashing represents real financial loss.

3. Priority Verification

Public verifier prioritizes high-trust participants:

Trust Level	Verification Priority	Public Explorer Badge
0-1,000 tPIL	Standard queue	None
1,000-10,000 tPIL	Fast-track (+50% speed)	⭐ Verified
10,000+ tPIL	Instant processing	⭐⭐ Trusted Partner

Why this matters: In disputes or audits, high-trust timestamps carry more weight.

4. Fee Discounts

Reward long-term participants with lower operational costs:

Trust Level	Transaction Fee Discount
0 tPIL	0% (base rate)
1,000 tPIL	10% discount
10,000 tPIL	25% discount
100,000 tPIL	50% discount (maximum)

5. Community Grant Voting

tPIL holders participate in civic allocation decisions:

Quarterly vote:
- Which NGOs receive free credits?
- Which university pilots to fund?
- Community-proposed initiatives

Voting power: 1 tPIL = 1 vote

---

Economic Sustainability

Bootstrap Phase (Year 1-3)

Challenge: Low transaction volume, validators need subsidy

Solution:

Revenue from pilier.org subscriptions: €X
├─ Covers development costs
└─ Inflation covers validator operational cost gap

PIL minted annually: ~75,000 PIL (2.5%)
├─ 100% to validators
└─ Temporary until fees sufficient

Self-Sustaining Phase (Year 3+)

Milestone: Transaction fees exceed validator operational costs

Result:

No more inflation needed
├─ Validators fully self-funded
├─ 5% of fees continuously fund Civic Treasury
└─ Network economically independent

Long-Term Scenarios

Conservative (50,000 tx/month)

Monthly fees: 50,000 × €0.003 = €150
Validators (3): €50/validator/month
├─ Not sufficient (target up to €500/validator)
└─ Inflation subsidy: ~€1,350/month
Civic Treasury: 5% × €150 = €7.50/month

Base (300,000 tx/month)

Monthly fees: 300,000 × €0.003 = €900
Validators (3): €300/validator/month
├─ Getting close (target up to €500/validator)
└─ Inflation subsidy: ~€600/month
Civic Treasury: 5% × €900 = €45/month

Growth (500,000 tx/month)

Monthly fees: 500,000 × €0.003 = €1,500
Validators (3): €500/validator/month
├─ Self-sustainable! ✓
└─ No inflation needed
Civic Treasury: 5% × €1,500 = €75/month

---

Use Cases for PIL

1. Gas for Transactions

Primary use: pay for on-chain operations

// Client submits DPP creation
const tx = api.tx.dpp.create(productId, metadata);

// Gas paid from client's sponsored allocation
await tx.signAndSend(clientAccount);
// Cost: 0.004 PIL (deducted from monthly budget)

2. Validator Bonds (Future)

If validators become permissionless (post-mainnet):

Validator must stake:
├─ 10,000 PIL (~€10,000) as collateral
├─ Locked while validating
└─ Slashable if misbehaves

Note: Not applicable during institutional validator phase.

3. Governance Voting

Vote on protocol changes:

Lock 1,000 PIL for 12 months
├─ Receive 2,000 tPIL (2× multiplier)
└─ 1 tPIL = 1 vote on proposals

Longer locks = more voting power.

4. Developer Grants

External developers receive PIL grants:

Build custom pallet:
├─ Milestone 1: 5,000 PIL (design approved)
├─ Milestone 2: 10,000 PIL (testnet deployment)
└─ Milestone 3: 5,000 PIL (mainnet audit passed)

---

Comparison with Other Models

PIL vs. Traditional Blockchain Tokens

Feature	PIL (Pilier)	Bitcoin/Ethereum	Polkadot DOT
Purpose	Utility only	Store of value / Gas	Governance + Staking
Price	Stable (~€1)	Volatile	Volatile
Trading	No exchanges	Public exchanges	Public exchanges
Speculation	Not possible	Primary use case	Common
Inflation	0-5% (temporary)	Fixed / Low	~10% annual
Use Case	DPP compliance	Payments / Smart contracts	Parachain bonding

PIL vs. Stablecoins (USDC, DAI)

Feature	PIL	USDC	DAI
Backed by	Operational policy	USD reserves	Collateral (crypto)
Redeemable	No	Yes (1:1 USD)	Yes (market rate)
Transferable	Within ecosystem only	Freely	Freely
Target value	€1	$1	$1
Regulation	Not a security	E-money license	Decentralized

Key difference: PIL is not redeemable for fiat and cannot leave the Pilier ecosystem.

---

FAQ

Where do the 5% of transaction fees go?

Answer: 5% of every transaction fee flows automatically to the Civic Treasury, sustaining the public utility layer — free on-chain access for universities, NGOs, municipalities, and industry associations.

This replaces a traditional burn mechanism. Rather than destroying tokens to create artificial scarcity, Pilier reinvests commercial activity into public good participation. The more the network grows, the more the civic layer is funded.

Example:

• Year 1 (low volume): 5% of fees = ~€7–10/month to Civic Treasury
• Year 5 (high volume): 5% of fees = €75–200/month to Civic Treasury, supplemented by validator excess returns

Can PIL inflate indefinitely?

No. Inflation is strictly capped at 5% annually and requires a formal tPIL governance vote to be adjusted.

Expected trajectory:

• Year 1-2: ~2.5% inflation (essential validator operational cost coverage)
• Year 3-5: ~1% inflation (gradually phasing out as transaction volume scales)
• Year 5+: 0% inflation (the network becomes fully self-sustainable through transaction fees)

Why not use an existing stablecoin (like USDC or EURC)?

1. Regulatory Compliance (MiCA): Stablecoins often trigger "Asset-Referenced Token" status under EU MiCA regulations, requiring complex e-money licenses and redemption obligations. PIL is a non-redeemable utility credit, making it legally resilient. 2. Technical Flexibility: PIL enables "Sponsored Transactions" (SaaS-first UX), allowing clients to use the blockchain without managing gas or wallets directly. 3. Ecosystem Governance: PIL allows the protocol to link voting power (tPIL) directly to the utility and commitment of the participants.

Can I buy PIL on a public exchange?

No. PIL is not a tradable asset and has no secondary market. It is distributed exclusively through:

• Client Subscriptions: Allocated via pilier.org for transaction sponsorship
• Validator Operational Coverage: Distributed to nodes covering network infrastructure
• Ecosystem Grants: Provided to SaaS partners and civic organisations

What if the value deviates from 1 PIL = €1?

The 1:1 ratio is maintained through operational policy, not algorithmic pegs:

• Pilier.org always prices services in Euros and converts to PIL at 1:1 internally
• Since there is no external market, there is no price volatility driven by speculation
• If infrastructure costs change, governance adjusts the transaction fee (e.g., from 0.0025 to 0.0030 PIL) rather than changing the token's target value

What happens to unused client PIL allocations?

At the end of each monthly billing cycle, any PIL allocated to a client's "Sponsor Account" that was not consumed by transaction fees returns to the Treasury Pool. This prevents token hoarding and ensures the pool remains a self-replenishing revolving fund.

How do validators cover their operational costs in Euros?

The Foundation covers validator operational costs up to the current monthly threshold (initially €500/node, adjustable via tPIL governance vote) at the fixed 1:1 rate. Validators exchange earned PIL for euros to pay for hosting, DevOps, and administration. This is not income — it is removal of the financial barrier to participation in public infrastructure, analogous to EU funding of eIDAS or GAIA-X nodes.

From Year 3+, validators are expected to be self-funded from transaction fees. At OVH EU pricing, a Polkadot SDK validator node costs approximately €100–150/month, leaving validators with meaningful capacity to lock rewards as tPIL.

Does locking tokens into tPIL provide financial returns?

No. Locking PIL into tPIL provides Governance Power, not financial dividends. It is a "Skin in the Game" mechanism: the longer you commit to the network (up to 48 months), the more weight your vote carries in shaping protocol parameters like fees, validator sets, and the operational cost target.

How do validators manage their PIL rewards?

Validator PIL rewards are subject to a monthly operational cost threshold (initially €500/node, tPIL-governed):

1. Exchange with Foundation (up to threshold): Convert earned PIL to euros at the 1:1 rate to cover hosting, DevOps, and admin costs
2. Lock as tPIL (up to threshold): Convert rewards to vote-escrowed tPIL for governance influence — strongly incentivised during Years 1–2 when hosting costs are zero
3. Excess above threshold: Mandatory return to the Foundation, routed to the Civic Treasury

---

Next Steps

For Validators

• Validator Charter
• Setup Guide
• Hardware Requirements

For Developers

• Pallet Development
• Local Devnet
• RPC Reference

For Integrators

• REST API
• TypeScript SDK

---

Questions? Join the discussion:

• GitHub: github.com/pilier-org/core
• Telegram: t.me/pilier_org